Currently showing on The Discovery Channel, the new ten-part documentary series Extreme Dinosaurs is proving to be something of a tour-de-force, combining the very latest palaeontological research with state-of-the-art computer generated animation techniques. It is already an incredible success, drawing record audiences around the world. Nevertheless, it has come under fire from a number of respected experts in the field, who claim that the makers have sacrificed accepted academic thinking about prehistoric animals for the sake of sensationalism.
We invited the shows producer, Jerry Mack McIntyre to comment on these criticisms.
The University of the Bleeding Obvious: Mr McIntyre, The Discovery Channel has spent a great deal of money on this series, and if the ratings are anything to go by, it seems that it was money well spent. All the same, it must be quite disappointing that your efforts have not been recognised by the academic community.
Mack: It is quite frustrating, yes. Certainly, this is a commercial enterprise and we are out to appeal to as many people as possible. But its not just about entertainment: our aim our mission statement if you like is to educate and inform. With Extreme Dinosaurs we feel we are doing just that.
UBO: One criticism that has been levelled at you is that the depiction of these animals is based largely on supposition. Do you feel that you are the victims of academic snobbery?
Mack: I think theres something in that, yes. We have put a great deal of work into getting everything authentic. It has involved five years of intensive detective work. After all, theres only so much you can learn from a pile of fossilised bones, but by drawing in experts from many different fields we can piece the whole picture together. We can examine fossilised teeth to determine diet, we can learn about their environment from studying the rock strata, and we can look at their modern-day descendants for clues to their behaviour. Yes, there is a certain amount of supposition involved, but then in science there is always an element of guesswork. I think that as a result of our researches, we can be reasonably confident were right when we say that the brontosaurus spent much of its time in damp, secluded swamplands, or that the tyrannosaurus hunted mostly at night,
UBO: Or that the stegosaurus was a keen water-skier?
Mack: Exactly. Recent research has indicated that the stegosaurus was equally at home on land or water, so its reasonable to assume that it would have been quite an accomplished water-skier.
UBO: It is quite a leap of logic though, isnt it? Its not surprising that its attracted so much criticism. I must say, I was quite astounded when I first saw the clip of a group of stegosauruses lounging around in the sun and catching a few waves before wandering up to the beach bars.
Mack: Well thats the majesty and wonder of nature for you. Breathtaking, isnt it?
UBO: Well all right, what about the allosaurus then?
Mack: Ah yes, the allosaurus. One of the largest carnivores this planet has ever produced. A huge, vicious, terrifying predator. One of my personal favourites.
UBO: But is there any actual evidence that they were into hang-gliding?
Mack: Theres no evidence that they werent.
UBO: Thats not what I asked.
Mack: Look here, weve had some top notch scientific types on this - people with letters after their names. Theyve spent the best years of their lives studying this stuff. Theyve attended digs, examined artefacts and and, well, done a lot of very complicated scientific stuff. And let me tell you theyve unearthed some pretty compelling evidence.
UBO: Theyve actually discovered the fossilised remains of prehistoric hang-gliders?
Mack: No, of course not. Dont be bloody stupid! Theyve discovered a lot of rocks.
Mack: Yeah, and the really astonishing thing is that when we look at modern hang-gliders today, we find that there are nearly always rocks in the vicinity. So its reasonable to assume that the reverse is true that where we find prehistoric rocks, we can also expect to find prehistoric hang-gliders. Surely thats a reasonable conclusion to draw? Dont answer that, the question was rhetorical.
UBO: Very well, I suppose youve got equally compelling evidence that sabre-toothed tigers rode motorbikes?
Mack: Ah well, this of course is common knowledge. It has been accepted as fact since 1956 when cave paintings were discovered in France, depicting a sabre-toothed tiger popping a wheelie to the amazement and delight of a crowd of lady sabre-toothed tigers. The sequence in our programme is based on that very painting, and the bike is authentically constructed from the materials available at the time mostly rocks, bamboo, vulcanised coconuts and foam rubber, which scientists believe was in abundance during the cambrian period.
UBO: And the leather jacket?
Mack: Artistic licence.
And it would seem that artistic licence has been employed throughout much of the series. Look forward to future episodes featuring a skateboarding diplodocus, a parascending brachiosaurus and a plesiosaur called Dennis who holds the world drag-racing record. And weve just learned that The Discovery Channel is so pleased with the series that they have commissioned a sequel. Extreme Dinosaur Detectives will feature a gang of crime fighting velociraptors who use their special ninja powers to save dinosaurs in distress.
The latest in home entertainment
Modified pets for all occasions
As of February 2012 The University of the Bleeding Obvious comprised over 300 pages. We realise this might make the site a little difficult to navigate, so here's some suggestions to help you get around.
Mouse over the graphic to select a section index, or use the drop down box.